Connectivism & Connective Knowledge

[Home] [The Daily] [Wiki] [About] [Aggregations] [Readings]

[Options] [The Daily Archives] [The Daily RSS Feed] [Feeds] [Posts] [Places]

The Daily

November 3, 2008

Week 9: What Becomes of the Teacher? New Roles for Educators


This is a heavy assignment week, no readings are assigned. George and Stephen will, however, provide a short paper/recording on the subject to initiate discussion...


Mon: Recorded presentations and readings will be posted to the email list

Wed: Two Elluminate discussions (both sessions can be accessed via this link):

Friday: Discussion via USTREAM 11 am CST: See time zone conversion


1. Continue regular weekly activities - blogging, developing your concept map, and follow the distributed conversation through various sites (pageflakes, delicious, Google Alerts).

2. Begin work on your final paper

3. Submit your second paper - Due November 10, 2008. You can post the paper on your site as a blog post or post in the Moodle Forum

Highlighted Resources

Power in the Connections
Our last week focused on power and authority. The types of networks learners form will be influenced by the ecologies in which the learners exist. Tightly controlled environments may produce certain desirable results (i.e. predictable), but at the expense of innovation. And vice versa. Power to influence which types of networks form is an important discussion. Ailsa Axell: "ANT, and Foucault, and Connectivism all work inside of reality not existing 'out there' but being relational. Power is therefore not a given state of things, but is in the forces of action and inaction" Moodle Forums, , November 3, 2008 [Link] [Tags: none] [Comment]

Wasted Time - CCK08
Tom asks: "Now, what happens if a network is mistaken. Most students have a blind faith that what they are told is correct. For connectivism to function properly I believe this issue must be taken into consideration." This is a central challenge for every educator. How do we get learners to think critically about information they encounter? More importantly, how do we ensure that we are thinking critically about information we encounter? If you've followed recent journal publications and conference themes, it would appear that web 2.0 is the salvation of education. But what are we basing that on? Or for those calling for an end to schooling, what model is being offered as a replacement? And, when models are offered, are they significantly well-conceived to serve all stakeholders (sorry Stephen!) in the education system? Tom Whyte, , November 3, 2008 [Link] [Tags: none] [Comment]

CCK08 Failing?
Ken Anderson asks if CCK08 is failing. He sites declining activity in moodle forums, blogs, and live session attendance. He asks: "What I wonder is, did 2000 original particpants leave the course or are some still involved? Does someone have a handle on this? What is the feeling about the success or failure of this course?" I (George) stated right at the start that success for me was simply running the course. We have 24 enrolled learners. In a traditional course, that would be the only metric of success (i.e. what did those learners learn). We took a risk and opened up the course for a large group of participants. We had initial interest with 2300+ people sign up. Obviously not all were expected to be active participants - many were observing or simply following out of curiosity. The metric that Ken applies to this course is what we would expect with a usual course (participation, direct involvement, etc.). But many more opportunities exist - we found this coming out of our online connectivism conference last year: people visit the site and follow up with resources well after the course. The question is: can we deliver a large-scale open online course? The obvious answer is yes. The next question - and the hallmark of progress is building solid foundations on which to run the next series of experiments - is how we make it more effective in terms of learner support and engagement. In the end, however, success will be determined by each participant based on their own views and expectations. Ken Anderson, , November 2, 2008 [Link] [Tags: none] [Comment]


Here's what course members from around the world had to say. Want to join the conversation? Login and submit your feed. Then put this at the beginning of your post: CCK08

CCK08: Level One MindMap November 3, 2008
CCK08 – Week 8. Power: Networks vs. networks. November 2, 2008
Wasted Time - CCK08 November 2, 2008
CCK08 Understanding Self (Connective Behaviour in Practice, Part 1/8) November 2, 2008
CCK08 My power used for not being there. November 2, 2008
The Ping Thing November 2, 2008
Case Study in Control and Instructional Design November 2, 2008
CCK08 - Week 8 - Power, Control, Validity, and Authority in Distributed Environments November 2, 2008
The Downesian Skinner Box November 2, 2008
Reflections on Power, Control and Authority - Week 8 November 2, 2008
Skeptic Threads among the Gold November 1, 2008
CCK08 Paper #2: What could be November 1, 2008
CCK08 Current Cmap November 1, 2008
CCK08: Let’s begin to work together … November 1, 2008
CCK08 Week 8: Validity November 1, 2008
CCK08: Paper 2 - Changing Roles November 1, 2008
Why Stephen matters (NoT™) November 1, 2008
CCK08: Week 8: Authority October 31, 2008
CCK08: I’ve got the power (Moodle Forum) October 31, 2008
CCK08: Connectivism and the Challenge of Making Connections in Vast and Complex Networks October 31, 2008
“The classroom is nothing less than an state of the art information dump” October 31, 2008
Back in Romper Room and the Wizard of Oz October 31, 2008

This newsletter is sent only at the request of subscribers. If you would like to unsubscribe, Click here.

Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter? Feel free to forward The Daily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list. Click here to subscribe.

Copyright 2008 Connectivism & Connective Knowledge

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.