Welcome To Critical Literacies?

[Archive] [Discuss] [Search] [About] [Options]

Just like watching football

Some reflections on the live session yesterday - I (George) missed the session due to a last minute schedule change :( - so it's nice to have this quick summary before I dive into the recording. This week is a basic foundation week, an attempt to give PLE/Ns some type of description/shape. There is a good discussion in this Moodle forum on the similarities/distinctions. In my view, a PLE is not something that you can readily point to and say "here it is". I see PLE's as an ecology, a space in which learning occurs. It's like trying to describe water to a fish or air to a person.

A PLE can include a suite of tools (i.e. the classic Wilson diagram), but the tools are constantly changing. In 2000, my main tool was a blog and RSS reader. Now, it's a mess of different tools. But the concept of a PLE remains unchanged for me. A tool-centric PLE approach will not provide a long term view fo research or even implementation. In order to define a PLE, one has to enter a state of recursiveness between the self/learning/ecology. It's quite hard to do. It's much easier to talk about the *impact* of PLEs - i.e. the learner has greater control, it's distributed, and so on. The effects are far easier to detail than defining the actual PLE. A PLN, in contrast, has more form and structure - you can point to it and say "these 206 people and these data sources are my PLN. I But that's only one view out of 1300 - express your opinions on you blog or moodle forum...don't forget the PLENK2010 tag! Stefanie Panke, , Sept 15, 2010. [Link] 44674 []


Your Comment

You can preview your comment and continue editing until you are satisfied with it. Comment will not be posted on the until you have clicked

Enter email to receive replies: