[Options] [The Daily Archives] [Feeds] [Posts] [Places]

Principles for Evaluating Websites

I wrote this article a few years ago to give people looking at online sources some assistance in assessment and evaluation. It is consistent with my Fallacies guide, though much briefer and more applied. Readers of this course should notice the effort to balance the decline in the role of the authority with the increase in the role of reason and critical thinking on the part off non-authorities.

Sometimes it feels as though people think that non-authoritarian learning means students can advance whatever point of view they want, as though every view were equal. But not so. As Tom Whyte says, "providing students with training on verifying knowledge and sources is very important." True - but not just because it saves time (though it does) but so they have some mechanism for selecting with of their ideas to offer as candidates for belief. Stephen Downes, Stephen's Web, November 4, 2008. [Link] [Tags: none] [Previous][Next]

Comments

Comment

You are not logged in. [Login]

Title
Description


Your comments remain your property, but in posting them here you agree to license under the same terms as this site (Creative Commons). If your comment is offensive it will be deleted.

Automated Spam-checking is in effect. If you are a registered user you may submit links and other HTML. Anonymous users cannot post links and will have their content screened - certain words are prohibited and your comment will be analyzed to make sure it makes sense.