[Home] [The Daily] [Wiki] [About] [Aggregations] [Readings]
[Options] [The Daily Archives] [The Daily RSS Feed] [Feeds] [Posts] [Places]
October 28, 2009
I am trying something new, starting today: I am harvesting posts from the Moodle forum and posting them in the daily newsletter. The idea is to bring the forum to people more directly, without requiring extra actions to be taken in order to follow the discussion. I still need to attend to issues of presentation in the newsletter - it's a bit ugly right now - but I think we're getting to the point where the content can be pretty good.
Connectivism and Connective Knowledge course 09
A look, in Spanish, at the Connectivism course. "Y os preguntaréis… ‘¿y eso que tiene que ver con el Español como Lengua Extranjera?'" See also Un ejemplo de PLE (Personal Learning Environment).
el Máster FPELE,
Hederahelix,
October 28, 2009 [Link] [Tags: none]
[Comment]
Yeah, what about assessment?
Tracey Roberts finds a tongue-in-cheek remark of mine from a few years ago: "I want to change the system of assessment in schools because right now we have tests and things like that that are scrupulously fair, particularly distance learning where we outline the objectives the performance metrics and the outcomes and all of that. I want to scrap that system. I want testing to be done by at random by comments from your peers and other people and strangers based on no criteria whatsoever and applied unequally and unfairly."
Tracy Roberts,
IDWAD,
October 28, 2009 [Link] [Tags: none]
[Comment]
Position on Connectivism: CCK09 Paper 1
Interesting perspective on Connectivism and academia: "I find it odd that a theory that is often portrayed as denigrating traditional educational systems can be easy applied to advanced graduate programs. My name is worthless on its own, it is only through the connections with my university, my faculty advisor, and the people I know that my name has any value. I did not make any of these connections online, but through seminars, conferences, and other face to face meetings."
historian227,
Hiding in the Library,
October 28, 2009 [Link] [Tags: none]
[Comment]
Here's what course members from around the world had to say. Want to join the conversation? Submit your feed. Then put this at the beginning of your post: CCK09
CCK09 Sculpture by the Sea
Sydney
Hi Leila. Thanks for reducing the article to these points.
I wonder if a both/and answer would be most appropriate? For example, this moodle and other CCK09 sharing formats seem to tend towards a democratization of access to information through our sharing of resources and ideas; conversely, corporate institutions and their tools (e.g. google, facebook, amazon) seem to be exercising a quantum of control over our on-line entities and interactions.
The net affords me access to information of many sorts, not the least of which is the access to shopping. A large amount of the information I access relates to the purchase of goods, including research papers and books (often offered at a price).
October 28, 2009All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
Seems to me that some of the big players in the net have more power. Consequently, they are able to exercise more control over the learning that transpires connectively.
October 28, 2009Unfortunately, I don't think all animals are equal - never have been, never will be. It is inevitable that some will have more power than others. It's not power per se that is a problem, but rather how it is used. The question for us is what would be an appropriate/inappropriate demonstration of power in a network which aspires to the characteristics of autonomy, diversity, connectedness/ineractivity and openness?
October 28, 2009Related to the discussion of power in a network, Mejias's critique of network as a metaphor is worthy of our attention:
".. although self-interest might be a functional principle to organize networks, even at a local level, it might not be sustainable as the basis for a social ethics, which requires a degree of selfless engagement. If we are going to go with the network metaphor, we need a praxis and an ethics, for engaging with the world beyond our interests, which means accounting for the space between nodes, becoming invested in the non-nodal."
Reference: The tyranny of nodes: Towards a critique of social network theories.
Asako
I've started to read an extract on Open Spaces by Jai Sen, I haven't read it all yet but as far as I've got, he attempts to define this space:
"The concept of ‘open space’ has come to be used in many fields, from urban planning, education and multipolar media such as the Internet, to social and political practice. Given the religious, economic and imperialist fundamentalisms that have intensified over the last two decades, we need to understand the struggle to open spaces as a struggle against enclosure by either State or market corporatism and/or by fundamentalist forces within societies, such as religious, caste, ethnic, and/or nationalist powers"
I don't see how you can get away from social being reduced to transactions of capital, monetary or otherwise.
I still have to read it carefully again, but it's an amazing article! Thanks!
Asako
The "Through the Network (of Networks)- the Fifth Estate" reading, by William H. Dutton, talks about this issue, this reading completely captured my attention. It describes three contrasting views on the social role of the Internet, and one of them is the deterministic debate on whether the Internet is a technology fostering greater freedom of control. Within this idea:
Hi Leila. Thanks for reducing the article to these points.
I wonder if a both/and answer would be most appropriate? For example, this moodle and other CCK09 sharing formats seem to tend towards a democratization of access to information through our sharing of resources and ideas; conversely, corporate institutions and their tools (e.g. google, facebook, amazon) seem to be exercising a quantum of control over our on-line entities and interactions.
The net affords me access to information of many sorts, not the least of which is the access to shopping. A large amount of the information I access relates to the purchase of goods, including research papers and books (often offered at a price).
October 28, 2009
This newsletter is sent only at the request of subscribers. If you would like to unsubscribe,
Click here.
Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter? Feel free to forward The Daily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own,
you can join our mailing list. Click here to subscribe.
Copyright 2008 Connectivism & Connective Knowledge
Contact: stephen@downes.ca
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.